000 03650cam a2200373 i 4500
001 21216916
003 OSt
005 20230727122255.0
006 m |o d |
007 cr |||||||||||
008 190905s2020 nju ob 001 0 eng
010 _a 2019024203
020 _z9780691199719 (Pbk)
040 _aDLC
_beng
_cIISERB
_erda
_dDLC
042 _apcc
043 _aa-cc---
050 0 0 _aHA37.C752
082 0 0 _a001.422095 G346M
_223
100 1 _aGhosh, Arunabh.
_928030
245 1 0 _aMaking it count :
_bstatistics and statecraft in the early People's Republic of China
_cArunabh Ghosh.
260 _aPrinceton:
_bPrinceton University Press,
_c2020.
300 _axvi, 340p.
490 0 _aHistories of economic life
500 _aRevision of author's thesis (doctoral)--Columbia University, 2014, titled Making it count : statistics and state-society relations in the early People's Republic of China, 1949-1959.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _aA new type of standardized statistical work -- Ascertaining social fact -- No "mean" solution : reformulating statistics, disciplining scientists -- The nature of statistical work -- To "ardently love statistical work" : state (in-) capacity, professionalization, and their discontents -- Seeking common ground amidst differences : the turn to India -- A "great leap" in statistics.
520 _a"Among the biggest challenges facing leaders of the newly established People's Republic of China (PRC) was how much they did not know. In 1949, at the end of a long sequence of wars, the government of one of the largest states in the world committed to fundamentally re-engineering its society and economy via socialist planning while having almost no hard, reliable statistical data about their own country. This book is a history of attempts made to resolve this "crisis in counting." Drawing on a wealth of official, institutional, and private sources culled from China, India, and the United States, the author explores the choices made and the effects they engendered through a series of vivid encounters with political leaders, professional statisticians, academics, ordinary statistical workers, and even literary figures. Early reliance on Soviet-inspired methods of enumeration became increasingly untenable in China by the middle of the 1950s. A series of unprecedented and unexpected exchanges with Indian statisticians followed, as the Chinese sought to learn about the then exciting new technology of random sampling. These developments were, in turn, overtaken by the tumult of the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961), when both probabilistic and exhaustive methods were rejected and statistics was refashioned into an essentially ethnographic enterprise. The author argues that this history, usually narrowly described as a universal, if European history, cannot be understood without acknowledging Soviet and Indian influences which not only revises existing models of Cold War science but also globalizes the wider developments in the history of statistics and data. For historians of China and social science, and political scientists, sociologists, and anthropologists studying modern China"--
650 0 _aStatistics
_xPolitical aspects
_zChina
_xHistory
_y20th century.
_928031
651 0 _aChina
_xStatistical services
_xHistory
_y20th century.
_928032
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aGhosh, Arunabh, 1980-
_tMaking it count
_dPrinceton : Princeton University Press, [2020]
_z9780691179476
_w(DLC) 2019024202
906 _a7
_bcbc
_corignew
_d1
_eecip
_f20
_gy-gencatlg
942 _2ddc
_cBK
999 _c9729
_d9729