x + y : (Record no. 10710)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 04354cam a2200409 i 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 21555725
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250130163409.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 200530s2020 nyua b 001 0 eng
010 ## - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CONTROL NUMBER
LC control number 2020014347
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9781541646506
Qualifying information (hardcover)
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
Cancelled/invalid ISBN 9781541646513
Qualifying information (ebook)
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency LBSOR/DLC
Language of cataloging eng
Description conventions rda
Transcribing agency DLC
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code pcc
050 00 - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER
Classification number BF692.2
Item number .C454 2020
082 00 - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 155.3/3
Edition number 23
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Cheng, Eugenia,
Relator term author.
9 (RLIN) 31679
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title x + y :
Remainder of title a mathematician's manifesto for rethinking gender /
Statement of responsibility, etc Eugenia Cheng.
246 3# - VARYING FORM OF TITLE
Title proper/short title x plus y
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement First edition.
264 #1 -
-- New York :
-- Basic Books,
-- [2020]
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent x, 272 pages :
Other physical details illustrations ;
Dimensions 22 cm
336 ## -
-- text
-- txt
-- rdacontent
337 ## -
-- unmediated
-- n
-- rdamedia
338 ## -
-- volume
-- nc
-- rdacarrier
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note The difficulties of difference -- The problem with leaning in -- A new dimension -- Structures and society -- Leaning out -- Dreams for the future.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc "Eugenia Cheng can't help thinking like a mathematician. She also can't help thinking like a woman. After all, she's both. But there seems like there must be a clear tension. She had to learn to be a mathematician, for one thing, and-in the popular imagination, anyway-mathematics seems very "male," the domain of individualistic geniuses with terrible social skills, pursuing university tenure and fame. Those traits, however, aren't really what it means to do math: as Cheng has shown through her three previous books, what it really means to think like a mathematician is to see past the distracting, superficial details of things to find their essences. When she turned that thinking upon gender, she found, there wasn't much essence to speak of at all. But what she did find there has become this book. At the heart of x + y are two concepts: not masculine or feminine, but what Cheng calls ingressive and congressive personalities. Ingressive people are competitive, independent, bold, risk-taking, self-assured, and often have one-track minds: these are the people Cheng worked with in high finance, the sort of people who might do well as surgeons or daredevils. Congressive people, on the other hand, focus on society and community, take the needs of others into account, emphasize interconnectedness, and tend to collaborate. As a society, we associate ingressive personalities with men and congressive personalities with women. And herein lies the problem-the source not just of gender inequality, but a great deal of individual unhappiness. When a mathematician like Cheng pursues the issue abstractly, she finds nothing uniquely male about ingression or female about congression. But she does find that, from standardized exams to Nobel prizes, society fundamentally rewards the ingressive, thereby forcing many people-including Cheng herself, one upon a time-to learn and practice a suite of behaviors that they might not have otherwise. To Cheng, it would be a failure to think that a bunch of bad-ass female CEOs would represent true progress, or that the world will be better when men get in touch with their feminine side, because both those scenarios are predicated on faulty premises and bad abstractions. x + y is a call to action, offering a vision of how we can use the power of abstraction to make the world less competitive, that is, more congressive, and to solve gender inequality, not by encouraging men to be less aggressive, or women to be more, but by realizing that-once you start thinking about the problem like a mathematician-it becomes clear that most of what we ascribe to gender has nothing to do with gender at all"--
-- Provided by publisher.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Sex differences (Psychology)
General subdivision Research
-- Methodology.
9 (RLIN) 31680
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Sex role
General subdivision Research
-- Methodology.
9 (RLIN) 31681
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Social sciences
General subdivision Mathematical models.
9 (RLIN) 31682
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Categories (Mathematics)
9 (RLIN) 31683
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Mathematics
General subdivision Social aspects.
9 (RLIN) 31684
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
a 7
b cbc
c orignew
d 1
e ecip
f 20
g y-gencatlg
925 0# -
-- acquire
-- 1 shelf copy
-- policy default
955 ## - COPY-LEVEL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- cm07 2020-06-10 TW situational to Dewey
-- xm 07 2020-06-10 (TW situational)
-- rm05 2023-06-12 to CMD
985 ## -
-- LBSORCIP
-- 2020-06-30

No items available.




Contact for Queries: skpathak@iiserb.ac.in